Because an insurance policy is designed or drafted by the insurance company (or an advisory body such as the AAIS or ISO) and is generally accepted by the insured without discussion or negotiation, insurance contracts are called liability contracts. The insured usually has no say in determining the terms of the policy and simply adheres to the insurance terms set by the insurer. Accession treaties as a concept originated in French civil law, but did not enter American jurisprudence until the Harvard Law Review published an influential article by Edwin W. Patterson in 1919. Subsequently, most U.S. courts adopted the concept, which was supported in large part by a California Supreme Court case, which upheld the membership analysis in 1962. Membership contracts, also known as « model contracts » or « standard contracts », are contracts drawn up by one party in a position of power where the other party has no bargaining power. Membership contracts are typically used by companies that offer goods and services to consumers. When a contract of liability is presented to a consumer, the consumer may either accept all the conditions or use services elsewhere; the conditions are non-negotiable. Another notable sign of a liability contract is that the « terms and conditions » offered to one consumer are identical to those provided to any other consumer.
If you asked most policyholders what a « membership contract » is, they would probably look at you strangely. He notes that the idea of the membership contract is important to policyholders when disputes arise about the interpretation of ambiguous or overly broad language in the policy. In particular, Wilson states in his article on InsuranceJournal.com: If the political language is clear and unambiguous, the parties are usually bound by their terms. In general, a party to the contract is supposed to have knowledge of the terms of the contract and to be bound by the terms, whether they have been read and understood or not. According to Black`s definition of a membership contract, it`s pretty easy to understand how this can apply to an insurance policy. The insurance company offers standardized contracts (insurance policies) to consumers (policyholders) and, in doing so, the policyholder has limited opportunities to negotiate and substantially amend the terms of the agreement. Other examples of contracts that can generally be considered membership contracts would be leases and mortgage contracts. The court concluded that the insured can only « comply » with the terms of a life insurance policy that he has established in the case of a liability contract. Since contract law is the law of the State, the treatment of contracts of adhesion varies from state to state.
However, a common thread in the examination of membership contracts is the assessment of the unscrupulous nature of the contract or a particular contractual clause. The court will assess the meaning of the clause, the purpose of the clause and the circumstances of the performance of the contract. In 1941, the insurance industry began to move to the current system, in which the risks covered are first defined broadly in an « All Risks »[16] or « All Sums » insurance contract[17] via a general policy form (e.g.B. « We pay all the amounts that the insured is legally required to pay as compensation… ), and then by subsequent exclusion clauses (for example.B. « This insurance does not apply to… » »). [18] If the insured wishes to cover a risk concluded by an exclusion on the standard form, the insured may sometimes pay an additional premium for a confirmation of the policy that outweighs the exclusion. The insurance contract or insurance contract is a contract in which the insurer undertakes to pay benefits to the insured person or on his behalf to a third party if certain defined events occur. Subject to the « principle of eternity, » the event must be uncertain. Uncertainty can be either when the event will occur (p.B. in a life insurance policy, the time of death of the insured is uncertain) or if it will occur at all (p.B. in fire insurance, whether or not a fire will occur). [4] The definition of liability insurance is an example of a type of liability contract.
Read 3 min To provide more precise rules, one may get the impression that a more specific system of contract law and a more definitive interpretation of specific decisions are needed, and that the criminal « rules » that have been used so far only obscure the legal waters when it comes to: to cement the terms of detention contracts. . the type of insurance. A premium is paid in exchange for the assurance that a potential loss is covered. The prevalence of membership contracts has increased in the digital age. Many consumers now buy items and accept membership contracts online. Online sellers of goods and services must make their terms and conditions visible, fair and appropriate. For a contract to be treated as a contract of adhesion, it must be presented as a take-it-or-leave-it agreement that does not give a party the opportunity to negotiate due to its unequal negotiating position. Membership contracts are subject to scrutiny that can be done in a variety of ways: if the court can be satisfied in the disputed claims that an insurance provision is ambiguous and that the policyholder`s interpretation is as valid for coverage as the insurer`s interpretation of coverage, the court will find the vast majority of the time for the policyholder. These factors help insurance companies determine the legal obligations and actually anticipated risks of the policies they offer.
Another challenge for today`s consumers is that the critical parts of the contract are often hidden or spread across multiple documents. Some courts require that important terms be summarized on the first page of a contract. However, proponents of the standard contract argue that it promotes the efficiency of contract law, which saves time and negotiation costs. As early as 1910, membership contracts were mentioned as difficult to decipher and filled with provisions that may or may not be known to the insured. The courts must respect the spirit of the contract while trying to understand that such contracts can be confusing for the insured. Insurance contracts have traditionally been concluded on the basis of each type of individual risk (where risks have been defined extremely narrowly), and a separate premium has been calculated and calculated for each of them. Only the individual risks expressly described or « foreseen » in the policy were covered; As a result, these policies are now described as « individual » or « schedule-related » policies. [13] This system of « named hazards »[14] or « specific hazards »[15] proved unsustainable in the context of the Second Industrial Revolution, as a typical large conglomerate could have dozens of types of risks against which it had to insure itself […].
Commentaires récents